Tuesday, 14 July 2015

Is that a monster? No, its Jesus

"Is that a monster?"
The first words out of my infant daughter's lungs during a visit to a Roman Catholic church. As the 3-year-old spoketh forth, she pointed her finger toward the church's graphic three-dimensional model depiction of the criminal Jesus' legally binding execution on the cross. My mother nearly spat her boiled sweet into the contours of the mauve hat of the elderly worshipper ahead of her (probably nothing in this but there always seems to be a large number of distressed babies in church. In any other circumstance you would probably remove the child from the source of its distress and terror. In church, however, tell it to shush and let the shaman do his paid job and read out stories from his old leather book). I answered the question as accurately as I could. "No, that is a famous criminal called Jesus."
From the moment I was first instructed to recite and repeat...repeat...REPEAT! the christian mantras in all manner of daily pursuits, as was the norm throughout school and occasional church visits, I sensed it was all (...er, let me see, my vocabulary deserts me) bollocks. For a while, I was seduced by the reward-based social myths of Father Christmas, the tooth fairy and the egg thing at Easter. I'm getting chocolate, money, a new football and a bike - as much a no-brainer as an 8 year old gets. 
At that age, it didn't really occur - or really matter - to me, whether the providers were real or make-believe. Inspired, as a small boy, by heroes like Gary Brazil, Daniel Laruso, Tony Ellis, Rocky Balboa, Frank Worthington, James Bond, Sean Gregan, Superman, Daley Thomson, The A Team, Ian Botham and Wasim Akram - and, often, equally taken by their ever willing enemies and opponents, the factual or fictional nature of each meant little to an 8 year old kid in football socks. They were all people - men - I aspired to be one day.
Jesus never really did it for me. I liked the story of Thor, Zeus, Hermes, Achilles, Beowulf and that bloke who saved Snow White. Again, their origins didn't matter.
But the mantra of christian prayers, hymns, stories and the rest never really did anything for me. I sniggered throughout most prayers, and invented my own words during hymns, with the simple goal to make the lad next to me piss himself laughing. Usually I found the singing attempts of nearby adults - teachers mostly, and my own father sometimes - concurrently hilarious and terrifying. 

Most of religious prayer is completely counter intuitive to me. Along the cold, hard, upright and uncomfortable pews of the grim and cold local church I was forced to attend as a kid, were hung large rectangular cushions, hanging from nails in front of each worshipper. These, I learned, were for people's comfort when kneeling in worship of their imaginary leader.
This desire for people to submit to a higher force was utterly perplexing to me, and I never ever once felt the need to do so.

Later, I would learn that there are countless other factions or cults containing similar types of community knee bending only, in other cults the imagined recipient of this acquiescence was slightly different. Each had a mandated set of rules and life instructions based around abstaining from doing things with, to and for your body, and those of other people and animals. All of which, however, required those wanting to join in to completely submit to the rules of the club. Take your shoes off. Put your shoes on. Take your hat off. Put a sheet over your head. Don't cut your sideburns. Get on your knees five times a day. Say you're sorry a lot, and then make the same mistake again.

I bow to the reaction of a 3 year old child, when she saw a model of a blooded, filthy dead or dying man hanging by his hands from a wooden structure, on the wall of a cavernous building full of kneeling down, fully grown adult humans.
"Is that a monster?"
"You make up your own mind, petal, and never stop asking questions."

Ashes 2015 1st Test, Cardiff

The tale of these 4 innings will report a convincing win for the hosts against all the odds handed to them at the start of play.
England won by 169 runs - (full scorecard here)

 

Australia bring with them a swaggering confidence and a bravado that is unique within the sport, contrasting with the approach of the rest of cricket, which is a cautious modesty and respect for cricket as master of fate.
England has been utterly dominated in the 06/7 and 13/14 tours of Australia, losing all 10 test matches played. England managed to buck this trend between '09 and '13, by losing only 2 out of 15 tests during that time.
Australia do not take, or forget, defeat very well. They go down with a swagger, and return with that same swagger, belligerence and optimism.

The clamour, in the cricket media both home and down under, to pick the remaining flesh from the Australian carcass, is, in my opinion, a little hasty. The result is the result and over two innings any fortune either way tends to balance out. Some pundits may point out that the luck only evens itself out over an entire series.
Australia had a chance to take the scoreless wicket of England's most prolific batsman, Joe Root, in the first innings, and squandered it. Whether this counts as bad luck or simply a lack of skill, remains in the hands of the viewer. The viewer would then search for reasons for that bad luck. Perhaps the Aussies started the test with complacency. This is quickly quoshed when you note that, at the moment that chance went begging, Australia had already obliterated England's opening line up, to 43 for 3.

Australia may well have earned the right to be complacent in preparation for this latest Ashes series. After all, England failed to put up resistance during the most recent 0-5 reverse on Australian soil.
And with a resurgent England side that contains both talent and solidarity, the England victory at Cardiff will probably go down as the result of nonchalant Australia taking their recuperated hosts too lightly.
England has shuffled the pack and given chances to several players in recent months. There have been huge question marks over all of the top 4 batsmen, and rightly so, justified by their performances on the first innings scoreboard. Captain Cook's runs will be essential to a winning series for England. And in recent tests with New Zealand, Ballance and Bell have struggled to make a big impact.
Perhaps reassuringly for England is the confidence of the new blood with bat. The middle order of Stokes, Buttler and Moeen offer insurance for the fragile openers, as back up for the blossoming Joe Root.
If England's top 4 can start firing, then this would be disastrous for Australia.
England would be wise to focus on their own game in the short time ahead, and simply hope that Australian squad cannot recover from the inevitable meltdown that will follow this defeat. What can be certain, is that Australian cricketers do not enjoy losing, and they will move heaven and earth to put this first defeat right.
But, determined as they are, Australia will be unlikely to prosper unless they adapt to these lush, slow English wickets which offer less bounce than their pitches down under. Progress is not, therefore, a question of attitude, but one of technical skill. This England is not lacking in its own sense of bravado, and is technically ahead in respect of preparing for the conditions of play.
England should expect an Australian backlash from this victory in the second test, at Lords. But with the Australian squad morale teetering on the edge, and with their home media questioning the ability of half the side, a certain pressure will mount upon their shoulders in the build up. Not that they aren't used to high expectations. Its normal for Australian cricketers.
Huge stakes fall on the imminent second test. Heroes needed, once again.

2nd Test
Thursday, July 16-20, 2015 - at Lord's, London
England v Australia

Tuesday, 23 September 2014

Byrons 1992

I've attempted to compile an exact replica of the DJ playlist/mix from the summer of 1992 at Lord Byrons' Night Club, Tithebarn Street, Preston, Lancashire, England, United Kingdom.
The playlist is incomplete, so any suggestions are welcome. Not sure how you do this, but please, if you have a useful contribution to make, please try to leave a comment and a link.
'Byrons was a dance phenomenon that ended the 80s and kicked off the 90s by magically splicing the outgoing tacky pop with genuine indie scene, twixed the pioneering, new and emerging house music sounds that would define the rest of the decade in the UK and beyond.
Lord Byrons blended the lot. Thanks Pete.

Friday, 19 September 2014

Dyche and Henry - Separated at birth

Lenny Henry discusses Premier League budgets...



Sean Dyche (Dye-eeshhhh) discusses the lack of diversity in the arts...

Tuesday, 20 May 2014

World Cup 2014 - Brazil

I can't wait until the start of the 2014 World Cup of association football. I never can. Despite a cynical view of the grotesque and self-serving corruption at the top level of the sport, I always enjoy the World Cup. The multitude of matches that cascade through each day for a fortnight is my favourite part. The cagey, tactical and chess-like manouevres of the first round of matches, followed by a more ostentatious approach in match round two. Followed quickly by the shit or bust knock out of the final group matches. Defenders being outsmarted by forwards. Midfielders jostling for control of the field. Forwards waiting, predatorily, for their glimmer of a chance to strike. Goalkeepers hoping they're not going to be the star of the highlights shows that evening, for all the wrong reasons.


The second round is a chance to dream. Some major outfits will not make it. Some surprise qualifiers will sneak through unexpectedly - at least as far as most onlookers will see it. Turkey, Japan, Switzerland, Chile, Belgium all will believe they can go a long way in Brazil, while the world will focus on the usual suspects the heavyweights - former winners.
England Goalkeeper - Hatch
Other teams will be daring to dream beyond doing their nation proud. The African nations, well overdue a march through to the later stages, no doubt at all the USA are not there to make the numbers up. Australia will want to establish themselves beyond their South East Asia dominance.
England, my team, carry a huge expectation on their shoulders and need an injection of inspired skill from someone - anyone! - to break the very best sides down.
The climate in the host nation is always an advantage to the native country and their neighours. Hot humid conditions are more suited to the latin style of play, and possibly the African nations this time around. The cooler northern climates tend to get used to playing their fast-paced game at a high tempo and they can often fail to adjust their squads and playing style to the sapping conditions in the tropics.
Substitutions will play a vital role in the heat, and I predict the tournament will be dominated by the latin countries of South and South America southern Europe, and African sides. My one fear for the African sides is that their style is very physical, which is often exploited by the simulation that pollutes the game, and FIFA's apparent tolerance for this foul aspect of the sport.
Referees will come under intense scrutiny too, as players perfect their simulation skills to cheat their path to glory, without the officials seeing them or, should the referee see it, without the right punishment being applied. A sighting panel would be the obvious addition, for me, forcing retrospective "yellow cards" in the hours after a match. This will, in turn, free referees from having to spot simulation, and also deter would be cheats from attempting such means.
All in all, these ingredients go into the fun of the tournament. They create drama, disgrace, turmoil and turbulence. Gladiators of the modern era, it is over to you.

If you work in marketing...