Friday, 28 June 2013

Boasting joggers - quents

Warning: Spleen venting in progress
 Of all the sports about which people love to boast, there can be no more banal and irritating than the quent who boasts about the universally simple act of transporting your body from one designated position to another designated position at slightly faster speed than walking pace.
Firstly, may I wholeheartedly recognise and acknowledge the act of running for all its advantages. 1). This genetically coded system of human locomotion transports yourself and your belongings to a destination faster than walking, without the need for extrinsic assistance.
Shifting perspective, to the arena of sport and hobbies, I also recognise the benefits and satisfaction that one might derive from performing this activity for anything other than the aforementioned purpose of self transport. For some people, simply performing the act of running long distances fills them with complete and utter satisfaction.
But please stop short of this consideration that running is anything to boast about, or tell others that you do. Social media is chock full of people who post their latest personal best for the world to see. Clear and utterly bereft of any sense of irony or self criticism, these "posts" declare the owner's complete and utter self satisfaction with themselves. Perhaps it isn't "running" that is to blame. More, it is the catalyst by which the wankers reveal themselves to the world. Perhaps, on closer consideration, we ought to thank running for bringing these scum floating to the top of the sewage drain, so we can survey and avoid.
Nobody cares, to be honest, how far you ran today. Nobody is proud of you. Nobody respects you. Running is just a form of transport, and is, itself a component of sport, but not in itself a sport. By this I mean, apart from the geek next to you running faster or slower than you, there is no distraction, no opponent trying to knock you off your stride, no referee applying the rules. There are no rules, and no strategy that a 4 year old can't master in a weekend. There really is nothing to it. If you want to put yourself on the line and go running, then that is absolutely fine with me and the rest of the world. Indeed, if I see a person on the street having a jog, that's fine - good for you.
But in sport, bragging is not the done thing. In victory, it is polite, gentlemanly, ladylike and sportsmanlike, courteous and apt, to take satisfaction with humble modesty. The opposite, is the complete and utter wanker who runs around waing his hands in the air, as if to say "Nar na ni nar nar!" to all and sundry. You might aswell resort to type and shout "I'm the king of the castle and you're the dirty rascal" because you never really emerged from your 9th year of psychological development. You probably still have identity issues, as you never really created one for yourself. Indeed, you probably have an intense anal fixation, which is why running is the perfect hobby for you. It allows you to own the success, all by yourself, without having to share it with others.
Running is the realm of the selfish. Like (professional) tennis, snooker and golf, all sports that started out as social games - something to do on a summer's day or in a pub, with your mates, the introduction of competition has brought forth the anally retentive, who pursue personal success, amongst others doing the same.
For me, the team sports are universally more endearing. The fundamental difference being the victory or defeat are shared by the tribe. Victory resonates through the team, as defeat depresses all. As a social vehicle, team sports resonate strongly. Individual sports, hobbies and pursuits were never intended for such purposes. The conclusion is, that results are of no interest to anyone but the person involved.
In team sports, where sportsmanship remains integral, it is not acceptable to beat your chest when the battle is won. Far more class has the man, or woman, who consoles the loser, and says hard luck.
The solitary, lonely, and self-indulged individual runner (or golfer, or tenniser) misses out on this completely. Through social networks, these anal tosspots have been exposed for, ironically, their social ineptitudes. Look at me, I've done well.
Jesus christ, was your daddy looking the other way when you grew up? Short of mother's milk, or too much perhaps?
Wimbledon's latest news story is a plethora of "superstars" of the sport falling over, and "blaming" their lack of coordination on their surroundings. That's like a slow swimmer saying the water was too thick. Again, we hear these cocooned, developmentally-retarded creatures bleating like 7 year olds who lost at the school tombola.
And so in all individual sports, but at least they are professionals and have made it to a level resembling  impressive. If they publicised their success on social networks, they would be cannon fodder for such braggish arrogance.
Yet, for far less achievement, the proliferation of "look-at-me-in-my-running-vest" wankers grows and grows, without shame, without humility, and without any sense of the fact that the only words coming out of viewers' mouths, beggin with "F" and "W" and are spat forth qucikly and in immediate succession.

And I didn't even mention cyclists.....

Sunday, 3 March 2013

Radio news... not right now thanks, I'm dreaming.

In one instant a beautiful, expansive dream.
An unlimited and imaginative dream. Ethereal, perfect.
The next instant, all stops.
Arrested by the morning radio.

Chatter, opinions, news, traffic.
People taking sides. People voicing their ire.
That's awful, I'm outraged. He should be strung up.
Rage, wrath, anger.

For a moment, true consciousness.
For a second, maybe more, a happy place and time.
A second in which I moved freely, thought freely and acted, free.
Unafraid. Confident. Comfortable.

"Nine dead in hot air balloon accident."
"Fuel prices on the rise again."
"Hospital near you closing down."
"Eat breakfast and you die."

Welcome back!
It could be you next time...
Don't be afraid. Just do as you're told.
Be where you should be.

Thanks, but I'll stay in my dream.
I have unfinished business.
Like how to describe the cool fine sand under my feet.
Or the warm evening sun on my shoulders, as I stroll.

I'm not really here, I'm really out there.
I'm out there, everywhere, not here.

Tuesday, 11 December 2012

Sad Irony Of Fans Paying To Voice Displeasure

Sad Irony Of Fans Paying To Voice Displeasure
Chelsea fans who booed Rafa Benitez made their point, but what if there were 20,000 empty seats at the Bridge? Daniel Storey on the only way fans can really protest...article by Daniel Storey here... http://www.football365.com/f365-says/8285174/Sad-Irony-Of-Fans-Paying-To-Voice-Displeasure

Daniel Storey is spot on. But what he suggests is unlikely. This is because, in the main, football fans of top flight clubs are intrinsically selfish consumers who overuse inaccurate terms like "we" (especially overused by glory hunters to over compensate for their inactive non-attendance - selecting the appropriate Sky channel, or watching it at the pub, doesn't count) to suggest some form of active-group-collective-belonging-family behaviour, when all they really do is sit motionless and open their eyes to passively absorb the action of others. The reality is that each spectator is merely seeking their own personal, passive gratification from an experience. Usually this does not depend in the slightest on the feelings of others. In fact, most football fans couldn't care less about the person sat next to them, once the final whistle blows. Nothing wrong with that, but don't call it a "movement" as if the fans being there are attached by common purpose. This carries with it the delusion of loyalty to some badge, some town or some coloured kit and that this loyalty is somehow a "shared experience". The irony is that the beneficiaries of this loyalty are the owners of the club, ironic because their only interest in the club is how it affects their stock.
The phrase "put your money where your mouth is" comes to mind. Walk the talk, or shut the fuck up." Until the selfishness of fans is replaced with genuine desire to take action - at cost to self - then the clubs - read "investment opportunities" - will continue to drain as much credit out of the fans as they possibly can.
"Fans" of these top four clubs ought to quit moaning when there is very little wrong. Try supporting a real football club with organic foundations which class survival as success, and who survive thanks only to benevolent donations. For one Chelsea there are several Brentfords, Leyton Orients, Lutons. For every Manchester, there are several Bury, Stockport, Oldham and Prestons. Then you might find something worth complaining about, and where fans' money, and presence is more valued by the club.

Wednesday, 31 October 2012

Icke and Collier update

On Saturday 27th September, 2012, David Icke presented new research at Wembley Arena. His presentation, in simple format, using projected images, audio and video clips, presented what he has found to be the reality that we exist within, and contrasts it with the illusionary existence and perception which people generally accept as reality.
In shows from previous years, David would spend a portion of the production describing his earlier transition out of the normal bloke, he once was, into the new shell. A new shell who saw another version of existence. David is now confident enough in his established presence, that he no longer needs 2 hours to explain who he is and how he got here. This opens up more time for him to present the information the audience wanted to hear.
The astounding thing about David, for me, is his unrelenting drive and compulsion to tell people the truth as he sees it. Not only that, but the lengths he has gone, in terms of time and travel, to leave no stone uncovered in his research into his subject.
David Icke - in goal

I am happy to admit that I listen to David for hours on end. His style is engaging, and his vibe is always based in the a positive outcome for people. In his books, David goes into incredible detail about world events that have shocked huge numbers of people. He also describes his own path the present day. What amazes, perhaps more than the subject matter, is the unrelenting energy and drive that David seems to have.
As I sat and listened to David talk on Saturday, as I have sat and read his books, for hours on end, the lingering question in my head is overwhelmingly "why bother" and "what keeps you going?"
The simple answer could simply be genuine enjoyment. It could be a bitter revenge complex against the agitators during his early renaissance - Wogan etc. As it turns out, David was well on his way long before Wogan invited him on his vehicle. David was already in full flow by then, having released a book to which he still refers in his most recent speeches.
This is the other thing with David. I am a complete sceptic about everything. I always have been. I take nothing at face value, and never did. At school, I always wanted to question the teacher on everything I heard. In a class at university in 1994, I asked the teacher why all computers had to be a grey white colour? What's wrong with blue, yellow, pink and red? Nobody else was asking that question. As I discovered, scepticism and questioning - an open mind - was not the best mindset on which to base an attempt on successful exam grades. While others around me worked studiously in pursuit of top grades, I would find myself seated in my exams, without a pen in my hand for most of the time, looking down at the exam paper, looking around the room contemplating "what am I doing here?", and feeling a compelling sense that this is all wrong. I'm sure others felt the same, only, I was the only one sat back in my chair while everyone else held their heads down and vigorously scribbling their answers.
My experience of education fizzled out towards my mid-teens. As I matured, my scepticism increased, and my desire to pause on one thought, to wander off, left me behind the rest. Again, in A-Level maths, while the others were taking it all in and racing through the theory, my wandering mind was slowing me down.
"Sir, could you go back over that again? I was thinking about something more interesting."
"There's no time..." replied the teacher.
Asking questions was not encouraged throughout my school days. And certainly not during assembly. I was, by all accounts, never afraid of the god presented to me through occasional church visits and school assemblies and prayers. I found prayers and hymns a chance to make jokes and snigger at the ceremony of it. I always found the lyrics at best, old fashioned and, mostly at worst, ludicrous.
 "Ev'ry knee shall bow" and "Onward christian soldiers". In fairness, I quite enjoyed singing in groups, but this was all about the noise and the harmonies, and the sharing of an experience. That is my abiding memory of school. The banter, the friends, the team sport, the jokes and the characters you met along the way. I enjoyed learning until my scepticism stepped in, and stopped me accepting what I was told to do, and questioned every step. This would cripple my education.
When I picked up on David Icke's work around the year 2000, I had already been searching for answers to my scepticism. More and more, I felt strong in my opinions and my philosophical stance, yet I was acutely aware that they didn't flow along with most people. In my view, most people were, to a great extent, flowing along, ticking over, and seemingly enjoying it as they went. At the same time, I was still feeling crippled by this ingrained scepticism and desire to question. A general dissatisfaction until I found a way to understand a thing, a thought, a decision or an action. It would be easy to say that my scepticism has at times brought my life to a standstill, as I hesitate at each minute junction of life, before proceeding.
In David Icke, I find an outlet for my scepticism, in a chap who seems to have unlimited scepticism in all that goes on around him. A man who will not take things at face value. A man who wants to dig into a subject, as far as it goes, before deciding he is satisfied that the random dots are starting to connect.
At this point, I want to define scepticism, as I am using the term here.
"generally any questioning attitude towards knowledge, facts, or opinions/beliefs stated as facts, or doubt regarding claims that are taken for granted elsewhere"
Or, in terms of philospohical scepticism
"an overall approach that requires all information to be well supported by evidence.....Sceptics may even doubt the reliability of their own senses."
I also add that David is a man who chooses to make up his own mind about everything. It may be argued, by   his critics, that David himself lays down a dogma which he asks people to "believe" ahead of anything they hear from the mainstream. In doing so, he would be contradicting his own mantra. The fact is, that David clearly states that he couldn't care less what you think, he only asks you to listen to what he has to say. As such, there is no consequence, no contract, no conditions and no behaviour - ritual - to which one must commit in order to listen to David. It is up to you.


 - Alex Collier speaks in 1996 about his knowledge gleaned from people from the Andromeda system during a meeting with them. This is an another account of an otherwise normal, busy, hard working man, running a successful accounting business, who, after an experience, walked away forever, realising how futile his life had been up to that point, and started recounting his experience and new knowledge. Click the pic to go to the presentation.




Wednesday, 12 September 2012

The police and lawyers involved - Shame on you

Hillsborough: Brian Reade on the day that changed football for ever
"How English football became a golden magnet for billionaire owners and millionaire players from every corner of the earth... at the cost of 96 lives
English football is different today.
Professional Police Officers: Doing nothing, as usual
The stadiums are home to middle-class families watching pre-match entertainment from comfortable seats and corporate clients sipping chilled wine over three-course meals in plush boxes. Potent symbols of the most lucrative brand in global sporting history.
Twenty years ago our grounds didn't smell of wealth and fine cuisine but resentment, from fans fenced into crumbling terraces by law- makers who viewed them as an unruly mob.
Their potential for tribal violence, not their consumer rights, were uppermost in politicians' minds. Crowd control, not crowd safety, the guiding principles of police charged with keeping them in check.
In those decrepit sheds, many of which had changed little since the Victorians built them, a tragedy was waiting to happen...."

read on...http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/hillsborough-documents-released-brian-reade-1318730

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

Hotel Groenendael, Amsterdam

The Nonsense
According to "Trip Advisor" the Hotel Groenendael is Ranked #321 of 346 hotels in Amsterdam.
One review from that site describes it as follows,
“Nasty room, and all my clothes were stolen!”
1 of 5 starsReviewed 8 March 2007
3 people found this review helpful
"This was, by far, the worst hotel I have ever stayed at. As soon as I walked into the room, I wanted to leave. The carpet and walls were stained, and the whole room was very dingy. I suggested to my husband that we should leave..."
______________________________________________________________
Reality Check
Call me old fashioned, but I find this little guest house in the centre of Amsterdam to be warm, cosy, friendly and perfectly located. I wouldn't, admittedly, take my missus there for a romantic break, but that is not, and never was, the point of this hotel, and it doesn't aspire to such claims. Far from the Travelodge generic box, Hotel Groenendael is a trip back in time for anyone who wants to sample the soul of Amsterdam as it was in a former heyday.
The rabbit hole opens the moment you exit Amsterdam's Centraal railway station, some 30 minutes by train (3 Euros) from Schiphol airport.
As you leave the station building, your eyes are filled with the visuals and sounds of Amsterdam's Damrak. You are dramatically plunged into the soul of the city. Be careful at this point not to be hit by a tram, a bike, a car or by the speedy local pedestrians as they meander through the awe struck tourists, staring out at the living mural in front of them. Bikes are everywhere.





You have directions to the hotel because you rang ahead and looked at a map. But you're already lost after twenty paces. No bother, that's the point. Amsterdam is a maze, and that's the fun of it. Its a colourful, twisted, gnarled, squashed place. Amsterdam is filled with wonder, everywhere you look. 
Luckily, the Groenendael is a short distance from the station. A right turn off Damrak and you're nearly there. Not before you've sunk deeper into a world of wonder, a pavement soaked in colour and flanked by quirky, irregular shapes and angles that leave you with whiplash as you crank your head round for a double take.
You apologise to the pedestrian coming towards you. You apologise to the cyclist you've caused to swerve. You apologise to the tram driver who has halted his entire cargo to avoid splatting you all over the tiled cobbles. "Sorry, I was looking over there!"
Blink and you'll miss it, but the sign is there, poking out into the streetscape. Hotel Groenendael. A sinister door invites you to ring the doorbell. You push the button. A buzzer sounds, indicating the door's locking mechanism has disengaged. You pull open the door, and face a ladder-like, vertical flight of stairs. On this occasion you've booked ahead, and, 12 hours earlier, fulfilled the hotelier's request to phone ahead to confirm you'll be arriving, and when. They're expecting you. 2 double rooms. Bed and Breakfast. 
You open a thin door and enter the first floor reception. Its a modest, narrow, cosy lounge decked from floor to ceiling in travel memorabilia from the USA and other parts of the world. Currency notes from all over the world form a patchwork wallpaper, as do a collection of North American car number plates, pinned to the walls. There's a tall drinks refrigerator and a tiny kitchen at one end, The other end features a few quaint tables and chairs, a settee, and a tiny "office/reception/TV".
The hotelier invites you to complete the usual visitor's form, and asks if you'd like to pay up front or at the end. No bother, your choice. He issues you with keys for the room, and for the front door at street level. "Keep the noise down at night, please." he requests, "Breakfast is 8-10am", before slouching back into his chair to continue watching the Dutch news on his TV.
The rooms are, like most of Amsterdam's crash pads, basic. A sink, a bed or two, a light switch, a tile mirror, and a plug socket, and a painting. Toilets and showers are across the hallway, shared with the other guests. The rooms are warm, and some (I've stayed in most of them) rooms feature great views of the rooftops across the city centre, or the street below.
The Dutch are a people who do not mess about. They are not lacking in a sense of humour, but they keep it wrapped up in a matter-of-fact style. Not overly intent on making friends with you, but self-assured enough to reassure you that they will help you if needed. Ask a question, you'll get a straight answer. After 7 or 8 visits, they will engage you in short conversations. Up to that point, anything you need to know, they are willing to help and advise. But they leave you alone to get on with the serious business of losing yourself in Amsterdam. Some 4 hours after leaving my Lancashire home, my bag is off my shoulder, and I'm off down the rabbit hole.

Part 2...coming soon
Funky Street. Nieuwendijk Voorburgwal

Wednesday, 18 January 2012

Trolljegeren

Troll Hunter, the most fun film I've seen for a long time. Refreshingly, its a Norwegian movie that succeeds on the scenery alone. Once you add in the storyline, you're onto a winner.
Intentional or not, the script and/or translation is, in parts, very funny. A very clever script which nods to the X Files, and brings in characters who would have slotted in perfectly.
A very funny story surrounding the popular children's (fairy) story of grumpy old Trolls coming out to eat in the woods and forests at night, but with a modern take on their pseudo existence (are they real or not?). For instance, the plot basically says "Yes, there are Trolls. But how does the modern world deal with their existence?" Cover them up, or destroy them?
The solution is never really decided, although with their growing mania, and excursions out of their natural habitats, they are unwittingly damaging the land and industries of humans outside their realm.
There were some golden moments in this film, which took me (36 years of age) back to feeling like a kid listening to the old folk adventure fairy tales. For me, it succeeded for that reason and many others.
Trolls. They live.